Products · pipeline
IN_DEVELOPMENT — active commits, no promised date

operating_verdicts

Is that factory actually operating? We test operational status independently, using night-time-lights and thermal signatures, always validated against a real confirmed-operating site and a real confirmed-not-operating site first.

Real sample

Real B-05/B-06 method-validation battery, 2026-09-02 - optical/SAR (Sentinel-2/Sentinel-1) vs. thermal (Landsat), tested at the method-validation site (Tesla Gigafactory Grünheide, confirmed operating) and the negative control (Intel Magdeburg, project cancelled, never broke ground):

SiteNDVI shift (σ)NDBI shift (σ)Backscatter shift (σ)Thermal shift (σ)Verdict
Grünheide (confirmed operating)-2.99+2.95+1.89+1.01Optical/SAR: OPERATING_SIGNAL_DETECTED
Magdeburg (negative control, cancelled)-0.62+0.21-0.01+0.15Correctly: NO_SIGNAL

Optical/SAR method validated (strong real signal at the confirmed-operating site, clean negative control). The thermal channel was tested too and came back a clean, pre-registered FAIL (threshold was 2.0σ, Grünheide only reached 1.01σ) - reported honestly as a dead line, not hidden. Full detail: china_industrial_reality product page.

Method

Sentinel-2 NDVI/NDBI + Sentinel-1 VV backscatter time series, sustained shift in the last third of the post-baseline period measured in units of pre-registered baseline sigma. Threshold fixed before looking at any result.

Request access / notify me

This line has real, active work behind it - not a placeholder. Leave your email and we'll reach out when it graduates to a product.